Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, along with case law at both the federal and state levels.

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It's properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more

13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is founded along with the employee is found guilty after thanks process of legislation, it is the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct is not really enough but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful way. Read more

Although there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds small sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent during the home state, relevant case law from another state could possibly be considered through the court.

Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. Lessen courts within the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, along with the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every single state has its very own judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is usually referred to since the “supreme” court, Though there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Whilst state courts could also generally hear cases involving federal laws.

Should you find an error while in the information of a published opinion (such as a misspelled name or a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over read more the same kind of case.

Article 27 with the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity from the pay scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the clear negation in the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government insurance policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on set up court precedents, plus the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels. When this sort of regulation strives to shape our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are recognized by executive agencies based on statutes.